Resources: Database Human Rights
IN WATCHING the flow of events over the past decade or so, it is hard to avoid the feeling that something very fundamental has happened in world history. The past year has seen a flood of articles commemorating the end of the Cold War, and the fact that "peace" seems to be breaking out in many regions of the world. Most of these analyses lack any larger conceptual framework for distinguishing between what is essential and what is contingent or accidental in world history, and are predictably superficial. If Mr. Gorbachev were ousted from the Kremlin or a new Ayatollah »
A mere thirty-three years ago, on January 20, 1977, Jimmy Carter inaugurated his presidency by proclaiming from the Capitol steps, "Because we are free we can never be indifferent to the fate of freedom elsewhere.... Our commitment to human rights must be absolute." Most people had never heard of "human rights." Except for Franklin Delano Roosevelt in a couple of passing references, no president had really mentioned the concept, and it never had gained much traction around the world either. Carter's words sparked an intense debate at every level of government and society, and in political capitals across the Atlantic »
In the past few weeks, tens of thousands of young men and women have begun their college careers. They have worked hard to get there. A letter of admission to one of the country's selective colleges or universities has become the most sought-after prize in America. The students who have won this prize are about to enter an academic environment richer than any they have known. They will find courses devoted to every question under the sun. But there is one question for which most of them will search their catalogs in vain: The question of the meaning of life, »
"If I look at the mass I will never act": Psychic numbing and genocide Paul Slovic1 Decision Research and University of Oregon Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 2, no. 2, April 2007, pp. 1-17. Abstract Most people are caring and will exert great effort to rescue individual victims whose needy plight comes to their attention. These same good people, however, often become numbly indifferent to the plight of individuals who are "one of many" in a much greater problem. Why does this occur? The answer to this question will help us answer a related question that is the topic of »
Other Categories
9/11 and its aftermath (10)activism (2)
affirmative action (1)
AIDS (2)
anti-Muslim (7)
Anti-Semitism (7)
Armenian genocide (9)
Burma (4)
Bystanders (15)
Cambodian genocide (4)
Cold War (2)
Communism (3)
Congo (1)
Discrimination and admissions (4)
Eugenics (14)
fascism (1)
Genocide (4)
hate crimes (2)
hate crimes/hate speech (1)
Herero genocide (1)
Holocaust denial (3)
Human Rights (4)
Identity (1)
intervention (3)
Israeli-Palestinian conflict (4)
Judgment and reconciliation (2)
Nationalism (1)
Nazis, Hitler, and the Holocaust (15)
Nuclear, chemical, and biological weaponry and war (4)
Nuremberg trials (1)
Obedience (5)
propaganda in the Nazi era (3)
race and education (6)
race relations in Boston (6)
Race, class, ethnicity, and stereotyping (50)
reconciliation (1)
red vs. blue state divide (1)
Rwandan genocide (8)
Sexual orientation and discrimination (3)
slavery (2)
South Africa and apartheid (1)
Sudanese genocide (19)
torture (2)
Ukranian famine (1)
United Nations (3)
War and Violence (7)
War in Iraq (8)
World War I (2)
World War II in Asia (5)
Yugoslav genocide (6)